Because of the growing number of performance rating schemes - and/or ways to value your buying decision in the market today - it has become difficult to make a decision that doesn’t come with some form of buyer’s remorse at a later date. Following are some of the more obvious things to watch out for when buying a battery:
Some companies have invented their own rating system; Recognizing that the process of comparing deep cycle batteries should be simplified, An American based manufacturer of batteries invented a new labeling system incorporating the “Lifetime Energy Unit” (LEU). This was their way of attempting to help a buyer determine the lifetime performance and value of any given battery in the market. Simply stated, and in the words of the SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA. manufacturer:
“Lifetime Energy Units (LEU) signify the number of kilowatt-hours of energy a battery delivers over its lifetime. The bigger the number, the more total work the battery can perform. Before the introduction of LEUs, accurately determining battery performance and value required complex calculations. Engineers compute the true worth of a battery as the total energy it contains, measured in kilowatt-hours (KWH). To derive a number for KWH, they build a curve that profiles the relationship between run time and number of cycles. The area under the curve is the total energy the battery delivers over its lifetime. When amp-hours are multiplied by battery voltage, the result is the battery's capacity in watt-hours. The next step - comparing a battery's value - is also simplified. By dividing the LEU by the battery's price, the prospective purchaser obtains a value figure (energy units per dollar) that ensures an apples-to-apples comparison between competing products.”
Discover® completely rejects this position. As with the variations in determining Reserve Capacity and Cranking Amps - mentioned earlier - this is NOT a recognized Battery Council International (BCI) method for rating or comparing batteries as suggested by the manufacturer. In fact the manufacturer leaves out the exact method of determining LEUs in order that an exact comparison be done, which was their stated purpose for establishing the rating. This creates a situation where two suppliers could use two sets of methodology to determine their respective LEUs, making reasonable comparisons impossible. This implies that the LEU idea or concept in practice is simply a marketing tool with no real scientific basis for engineers as the manufacturer suggests. In fact however, LEUs – as a way of helping buyers make an informed decision – would work very well if the buyer was given some additional pieces of data (data that IS available from other manufacturers and that could be used to make meaningful comparisons):
In addition to the problems listed above for making good performance comparison amongst different batteries, using the LEU marketing tool to make a serious value comparison is equally flawed. The value comparison requires more in the way of details also. Some, but certainly not all of the issues to be examined and required in determining value are:
If these values data were known, the buyer would then be able to determine the true energy units per dollar, or lifetime energy value as suggested by the manufacturer who introduced the LEU calculation.